Official sources
Government statements, military spokespersons, civil defence agencies, emergency services and international organisations. Useful for what was publicly claimed, but claims may still require corroboration.
WarStrikes / Transparency
How WarStrikes evaluates open-source reports and makes uncertainty visible.
WarStrikes is built around open-source information. In fast-moving conflicts, early reports can be incomplete, contradictory or wrong. Our verification approach is designed to make uncertainty visible rather than hide it.
Government statements, military spokespersons, civil defence agencies, emergency services and international organisations. Useful for what was publicly claimed, but claims may still require corroboration.
Major international and regional news organisations. Useful for context and editorial standards, though early reports can still change.
Often fastest for local detail and on-the-ground context. May require cross-checking against additional sources.
Geolocated footage, satellite imagery, public videos and photos, and flight or maritime data when available. Visual material still requires careful evaluation.
X, Telegram, Reddit and local witnesses. Treated carefully and not presented as confirmed unless corroborated by additional reporting or evidence.
For each event, users should review:
If you believe an event is inaccurate, outdated, duplicated or missing important context, please contact us with the event URL and supporting source links.